JOPSS - Search Results

JAEA Reports

Analysis of measurements for a Uranium-free core experiment at the BFS-2 critical assembly

Hunter

JNC TN9400 99-049, 74 Pages, 1999/04

This document describes a series of calculations that were carried out to model various measurements from the BFS-58-1-I1 experiment. BFS-58-1-I1 was a mock-up of a uranium-free, Pu burning core at BFS-2, a Russian critical assembly operated by IPPE. The experiment measured values of keff, Na void reactivity worth, material sample reactivity worths and reaction rate ratios. The experiments were modelled using a number of different methods. Basic nuclear data was taken from JENDL-3.2, in either 70 or 18 groups. Cross-section data for the various material regions of the assembly were calculated by either SLAROM or CASUP; the heterogeneous structure of the core regions was modelled in these calculations, with 3 different options considered for representing the (essentially 2d) geometry of the assembly components in a 1D cell model. Whole reactor calculations of flux and keff were done using both a diffusion model (CITATION) and a transport model (TWOTRAN2), both using an RZ geometry. Reactivity worths were calculated both directly from differences in keff values and by using the exact perturbation calculations of PERKY and SN-PERT (for CITATION and TWOTRAN2, respectively). Initial calculations included a number of inaccuracies in the assembly representation, a result of communication difficulties between JNC and IPPE; these errors were removed for the final calculations that are presented. Calculations for the experiments have also been carried out in Russia (IPPE) and France (CEA) as part of an international comparison exercise, some of those results are also presented here. The calculated value of keff was 1.1%k/k higher than the measured value, Na void worth C/E values were 1.06; these results were considered to be reasonable. (Discrepancies in certain Na void values were probably due to experimental causes, though the efect should be investigated in any future experiments.) several sample worth values were small compared with calculational uncertaint

JAEA Reports

None

Takano, Hideki*; *

PNC TJ9500 98-002, 126 Pages, 1998/03

PNC-TJ9500-98-002.pdf:2.51MB

None

JAEA Reports

Improvement of numerical analysis method for FBR core characteristics (II)

Takeda, Toshikazu*; *; Kitada, Takanori*; *

PNC TJ9605 97-001, 100 Pages, 1997/03

PNC-TJ9605-97-001.pdf:2.82MB

This report is composed of the following two parts and appendix. (I)Improvement of the Method for Evaluating Reactivity Based on Monte Carlo Perturbation Theory (II)Improvement of Nodal Transport Method for 3-D Hexagonal Geometry (Appendix) Effective Cross Section of $^{238}$ U Samples for Analyzing Doppler Reactivity in Fast Reactors Part I. Improvement of the Method for Evaluating Reactivity Bascd on Monte Carlo Perturbation Theory. Theoretical formulation in Monte Carlo perturbation method had been checked, and then introduced into a calculation code. The increase of CPU time is about 10 to 20 % compared to that if normal Monte Carlo code, in the cases of same number of history. This Monte Carlo perturbation method found to be effective, because results are almost reasonable and deviations of the results are especially small, by using the Monte Carlo perturbation code. However, there are somc cases that the results of the change of eigenvalues becomes positive or negative by changing the estimator, and there is no reasonable difference in the results between the conventional method, which does not consider the change of neutron source distribution caused by a perturbation, and the new method, which consider that change. Thus it is still necessary to check the Monte Carlo pcrturbation code. Part II. Improvement of Nodal Transport Method for 3-D Hexagonal Geometry It is certain that we can accurately evaluate hexagonal geometry FBR core by nodal transport calculation code for hexagonal-Z geometry named 'NSHEX'. However it is also found that in very heterogeneous core the results is not good enough. Because the treatment of the transverse leakage to the radial direction, which is use for evaluating intra-nodal flux distribution, is not so accurate. For the treatment of the leakage distribution, it is necessary to estimate the nodal vertex flux. In conventional method, the vertex flux estimated by the surrounding node surfacc flux around that vertex. On the contrary,